Personal UCL Thesis

Creator
Creator
Seonglae ChoSeonglae Cho
Created
Created
2024 Dec 11 15:45
Editor
Edited
Edited
2025 Aug 25 16:59
Refs
Refs
필립 영통 무조건 녹음
무표정 하고 웃지말고 인사만 지금 acl submission 2025 라서 그거로 바쁘다 workshop 줄거면 template 을 좀더 proper 하고 specific 한걸로 줘라 example 은 별로 안좋아서 지금은 experiment 에 집중
Philip insulted me by saying that even deaf people can do this, and threatened me by demanding I follow his instructions just because I’m the one grading. He also made a racist remark by greeting me with “Nihao,” despite that I’m Korean. He imposed his unreasonable template and showed no real understanding during our work on the company and the paper. It’s unacceptable that such a authoritarian person is in a supervisory position.
Personal UCL Thesis Notion
https://liveuclac.sharepoint.com/sites/CSCStudentIntranet/CS-StudentHandbook/Library/2023-24/CS_Grade-Descriptors_2021_22.pdf?CID=4fe82d12-628d-4537-982d-cb96f91cff5f
 
 
suggested guidelines, not strict rule about between ten-thousand to twenty-thousand words, not including references, figures and appendices
Typical Layout: You are not required to follow this, but a typical structure for the thesis is:
  • Title Page
  • Abstract Page
  • Chapter 1: Introduction. What is the problem and why is it interesting. State very clearly the problem that you are investigating. If your examiner cannot even understand the first few pages of your thesis, there is no chance that you will obtain a high mark. This section should delineate aims and objectives.
  • Chapter 2: Related Work/Background. this is connected to your literature review
  • Chapter 3: Materials and Methods. Describe your Data or anything related to it. Describe methods used as well as your method in detail and with great clarity, distinguishing it from other works (if it is indeed a novel idea. It is very important to clearly motivate your method, in other words this links to the motivations of the study as presented on the previous sections.
  • Chapter 4: Results. Systematically describe the all the results of your work. Here is important to describe a) how the methodology is put together to answer a question and how this links to the objectives of the study. Here you report all your work whether or not the results confirm or not the hypotheses postulated across the aims and objectives. You can discuss at the end of each result subsection the strength of the results
  • Chapter 5: Discussion: Here you put all the critical thinking in full operation. Based on your results how do they support or not specific and overall aims and objectives. Here you can also work on strengths and weaknesses of the study
  • Chapter 6: Conclusions: a final conclusion of the work. Summarise what you have achieved and evaluate honestly if you feel the approach has been largely successful. Highlight the most striking result.
  • Chapter 7: Future Work: Explain what could be improved still and perhaps why the
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
notion image
 
 
notion image
notion image
notion image
notion image
notion image
notion image
 
 
 
 
 

Recommendations