Seonglae ChoBest performers and worst performers is all giver
then which standards divide best and worst?
Top givers have clear standards.
- The Law of Value
Our value is determined by how much we give rather than how much we receive.
- The Law of Influence
Influence matters in how much you are able to give.
- The Law of Reputation
Even when you give, you should give in a way that earns the best reputation—treat one person as you would treat twenty-five.
- The Law of Sincerity
You need sincerity to earn the best reputation.
- The Law of Acceptance
Poor givers often fail at this.
It is not only about giving.
Do not feel uncomfortable receiving the rewards you deserve; do not see giving and receiving as a strict binary. Live by helping others, while also holding the thought that it will come back as something bigger.
And when I look back, what remains are only the things I could control.
How I treated other people is a meaningful and important part of what I’ll remember.
In the end, it’s about how I acted.
![[TED] 여러분은 주는 사람인가요, 받는 사람인가요? - 애덤 그랜트](https://www.youtube.com/s/desktop/aa71f599/img/favicon.ico)
![[TED] 여러분은 주는 사람인가요, 받는 사람인가요? - 애덤 그랜트](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/K9jrzmzMN8I/hqdefault.jpg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0Wl9K2gBIo&t=231s
Help peers
In OpenAI’s internal experiment, the
"Help peer" case did involve one agent helping another, but I interpret it less as pure cooperation and more as the agent acting because helping also benefited its own objective. The current direction of AI research seems to be moving less toward “one unified superintelligence” and more toward “different geniuses inside a data center.”