JS Pipe Operator

not yet

The advantage of writing code in execution order


// Status quo
var minLoc = Object.keys( grunt.config( "uglify.all.files" ) )[ 0 ];

// With pipes
var minLoc = grunt.config('uglify.all.files') |> Object.keys(%)[0];


// ❌ not pipeable
[1, 2, 3]
  |> .map(x => x * 2);

// ✅ pipeable
[1, 2, 3]
  |> map(x => x * 2)
  |> filter(x => x > 2);

Method chaining (.map()) is not possible (

JavaScript,

JS Pipe Operator), but regular function calls (map(arr)) are possible (

Python).

GitHub - tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator: A proposal for adding a useful pipe operator to JavaScript.

(This document presumptively uses % as the placeholder token for the topic reference. This choice of token is not a final decision;% could instead be ^, or many other tokens.) In the State of JS 2020 survey, the fourth top answer to "What do you feel is currently missing from JavaScript?"

https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator

GitHub - tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator: A proposal for adding a useful pipe operator to JavaScript.

Pipe function의 이해와 프로젝트 적용기

Photo by Quinten de Graaf on Unsplash 미니 프로젝트를 진행하면서 파이프 함수를 사용할 기회가 있어서 이에 대해서 제가 알아봤던 내용과 실제 적용기를 공유하고자 하는 마음에 이 글을 작성합니다.

https://velog.io/@hoi/Pipe-function%EA%B3%BC-lodash.debounce-%EC%A0%81%EC%9A%A9%EA%B8%B0

JS Pipe Operator

not yet

Backlinks

Recommendations