VLA is closer to a reactive policy, whereas WAM combines a world model with an action model.
WAM aims to directly learn the joint distribution over a future state and an action , given the current observation and a language instruction . Here, denotes the agent’s inputs (e.g., vision and proprioception), and is the next environment state resulting from the action. While a VLA model typically optimizes only the negative log-likelihood of the action, , WAM optimizes a state-inclusive objective, . This encourages the model to internalize physical causal structure beyond mere control, and to learn useful physical commonsense even from internet-scale video data where actions are not explicitly labeled.
World Action Models: The Next Frontier in Embodied AI
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have achieved strong semantic generalization for embodied policy learning, yet they learn reactive observation-to-action mappings without explicitly modeling...
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12090

Dyna Robotics Dyna-2: human → robot cross-embodiment scaling law
Dyna-2: A 1-Million-Hour Scaling Law for World-Action Models — DYNA
A world-action model pre-trained on 1,000,000+ hours of human video demonstrates scaling laws that hold on human and robot evaluation alike — and the many technical insights behind it.
https://www.dyna.co/dyna-2


Seonglae Cho