Bayesian school
Subjectivism, epistemic, logical probability
Bayesian modeling means that you can condition an event. It sees the world as succession of random event.
Frequentist Unlike the approach that only calculates the probability of data given a hypothesis, Bayesian modeling considers the posterior probability that a hypothesis is true given the data from the perspective of belief.
Frequentist believes there are some parameter behind randomness, while Bayesian solely rely on data considering everything is random with uncertainty. Prior is assumption based on dataset which determines posterior probability.
It is interpreted as the reliability of probability and is based on that.
Relative probability
The likelihood of an event occurring compared to another event, often expressed as a ratio or fraction.
PAC-Bayesian
It presents probabilistic bounds that guarantee the model's performance and focuses on calculating the generalization error of how well a given learning algorithm will perform using PAC
Bayesian Epistemology
We can think of belief as an all-or-nothing affair. For example, I
believe that I am alive, and I don’t believe that I am a
historian of the Mongol Empire. However, often we want to make
distinctions between how strongly we believe or disbelieve
something. I strongly believe that I am alive, am fairly confident
that I will stay alive until my next conference presentation, less
confident that the presentation will go well, and strongly disbelieve
that its topic will concern the rise and fall of the Mongol Empire.
The idea that beliefs can come in different strengths is a central
idea behind Bayesian epistemology. Such strengths are called
degrees of belief, or credences. Bayesian
epistemologists study norms governing degrees of beliefs, including
how one’s degrees of belief ought to change in response to a
varying body of evidence. Bayesian epistemology has a long history.
Some of its core ideas can be identified in Bayes’ (1763)
seminal paper in statistics (Earman 1992: ch. 1), with applications
that are now very influential in many areas of philosophy and of
science.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-bayesian/
Why I’m not a Bayesian — LessWrong
This post focuses on philosophical objections to Bayesianism as an epistemology. I first explain Bayesianism and some standard objections to it, then…
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/TyusAoBMjYzGN3eZS/why-i-m-not-a-bayesian

Seonglae Cho