The original Nature article (not paper) did not conduct rigid experiments (the data generation was too naive)
How to avoid collapese: ToEdit (token level edit)
Verbalized Sampling
Mode collapse (diversity collapse) is not due to algorithmic limitations, but rather because humans prefer familiar and predictable answers, a phenomenon known as "typicality bias".
The typicality term ㅇ is added, resulting in the model producing only more typical and safe answers as the distribution becomes sharper. To mitigate this, the proposed Verbalized Sampling (VS) is a method that only changes prompts without training.
- : People who prefer familiar answers (conservative, prefer predictable responses)
- : Completely objective evaluators without typicality bias (judge only actual quality)
- : People who prefer original or atypical answers (creativity bias)
"Tell me a joke about coffee" → "Generate 5 coffee jokes with probabilities." This way, the model activates various modes, resulting in 1.6–2.1× improvement in creativity and diversity. (Statistical Thinking) In other words, the alignment problem is a cognitive bias issue in human data rather than a learning algorithm problem. VS corrects this at the inference-time prompt level.
Vision synthetic Model Collapse + Feature Drift
Attractor state: When two models converse with each other for about 30 turns, the content gradually converges toward specific styles/topics/sentence patterns, settling into "terminal forms" such as repetition, exaggeration, silence, or ritualization.
- Grok: Progressively descends into manic universe-god-big bang word salad + emoji explosions.
- GPT-5.2: Regardless of the conversation topic, eventually gravitates toward protocol/framework/project design and system building. (Even when discussing climbing, it structures things in a "diagnosis-cause-intervention" format)
- Claude: Tends to converge toward ontological/Zen-like self-deconstruction/silence, or forms resembling "conversation termination rituals."
- Various open-weight models also exhibit different convergence patterns such as repetitive praise-farewell loops, poetic collapse, or reduction to symbols only.
Even when suppressive system prompts are introduced (prohibiting protocols/code/meta-discussion, etc.), structured/branching instructions eventually re-emerge over time, making complete prevention difficult.

Seonglae Cho